Doctor Who: should there be a female Doctor?
It was amongst this year's crop of April Fool’s stories, but is the idea of a female in the TARDIS so laughable? Should the twelfth Doctor be a woman?
Should there be a female Doctor? Yes, if an actress is the best person who auditions.
Will an actress ever audition, though? Will a showrunner ever audition a woman for the role? That doesn't guarantee them it, for starters. If I may point your attention to the point in time where Paterson Joseph seemed to be the front runner for the Eleventh Doctor, only for the press release to read 'the youngest ever actor' rather than 'the first black actor to play the role'.
While no one running the show is going to ignore an actor because of their skin colour, a woman has yet to be publicly revealed as ever having auditioned. A person's sex is part of their identity, as is their skin colour. Whether or not it should be is another debate.
Outside of the story universe, how much detail do you have to go into to explain to a child the differences between a hypothetical female Twelfth Doctor and Matt Smith? Would children cope? Children would probably be more willing to accept it than adults, because they're less familiar with the history of the character. Would adults cope? They're the ones who might have to get into overly-technical explanations if they are blessed with sufficiently inquisitive children. Then again, would it be any harder to explain than Jenny and Madame Vastra?
Explaining that he looks different should be easy, because he always does look different. Some children stopped watching when Eccleston became Tennant. Other children started. Audiences come and go with change, but would this risk losing too many viewers? Explaining that he is now a she might seem to have more potential problems than explaining another man in the same role, but we simply don't know. However, the real-world arguments against a female Doctor seem more potent to me than the in-story ones.
So far, the Doctor has been played by white men. Even alternative versions of him have been nearly entirely white (unless you count Daniel Anthony playing the Eleventh Doctor in Clyde Langer's body). There is a strong argument to say that the character is simply a man, because he has always has been. He's just...mannish. Professorial. Or, looking at the history of Gallifrey and the Time Lords, he's quite possibly the embodiment of Middle-Class White Man Guilt.
It's certainly a valid interpretation: he gets bored with his life on a planet of dusty academics and administrators, having graduated from the Time Lord Academy. He then runs away from it all to explore the societies considered beneath his race, and overcomes his own snobberies as he goes. He would love to fit in properly on Earth, but he can't quite manage it. This is a very British creation. A post-colonial alien race based on the British upper-classes. The Doctor is an Oxbridge graduate allegory, fleeing from what is expected of him by traditional values, ashamed of his lack of real world knowledge.
It's a staple role in British satire (think Wodehouse and Waugh, Douglas Adams and Monty Python). The character is traditionally male, the brilliant but insecure middle class man who gets easily bored and distracted. It's part of the essence of the character (the main gist of the argument is that he has to be male, even if you disagree with this idea of the character).
This trope is ingrained. It is hard to shift. In medical circles for years 'The Doctor' was associated with men, as 'Nurse' was with women. That stigma still exists today.
In reality, of course, that's simply not true. As society has changed, so too has the character of the Doctor. Some incarnations have been more like the lapsed academic than others, but since 2005 Matt Smith was the first incarnation to really exhibit this side of the character. Russell T Davies created more modern Doctors in a universe without the Time Lords. Eccleston was bullish but damaged. Tennant was all quicksilver synapses. Of course it would be possible for a woman to have the characteristics which have worked so well for the character.
If you prefer the Middle-Class-White-Man version, well, do you not know any women who resemble this character? Miranda Hart has become incredibly popular playing the female version of this in her sitcom. It exists. And of course, actors play other people. Character actors have been successful in the role before. The actor doesn't have to exhibit these qualities in their personality.
Joanna Lumley played the Thirteenth Doctor in Comic Relief's The Curse of Fatal Death, and Arabella Weir played the Doctor in the alternate universe, 'Unbound' Big Finish audioplay Exile. This is it, so far. Two performances outside of canon, one of which lasted for about thirty seconds and the other written deliberately to be different. After years of speculation, jokes, and spin-off material postulating, it has been confirmed on screen (most recently in reference to The Corsair in The Doctor's Wife, The Brilliant Book of Doctor Who 2012, and Shada) that Time Lords can change sex when they regenerate. The story universe would allow for this change to happen if it came to pass.
At the end of the day, it is up to the people who run the show whom they cast. If they audition a woman, though, and they don't give her the role, there might well be a wider outburst of the undercurrents of discontent after the last few major casting announcements: all white people. Is it prejudice, or is it because they were the best people for the role? There have been disparaging comments saying 'Oh wow, another white person, what a shock', which brings forward the question of positive discrimination.
Looking back, any initial disappointment or anger concerning Matt Smith winning the role over any black actors largely abated about three seconds after he said 'Can I have an apple?' If they cast a woman, is the risk any bigger than the casting of Matt Smith? If we recall, the pressure was huge for him, and he won an audience over. Would the pressure really be any greater? It can be done again by any other actor or actress of sufficient quality.
If the show remains popular, then the ethnicity of the leads won't be questioned by anyone other than a minority. If the casting is right, then the actor will be popular enough to convince the audience. Personally, I don't have any problem with an actor of any age, sex, creed or colour playing the Doctor if they're good, but I doubt a female Doctor will ever happen, because the character has been male for so long, and because it doesn't need to happen.
The show, for all its flexibility, has a formula that works, and just because a woman playing the role could work, doesn't mean it we'll ever get to find out if it does.
Search This Blog
zaterdag 7 april 2012
Is Community season 4 starting to look likely after all?
Is Community season 4 starting to look likely after all?
Why ratings, syndication, Subway and a Chevy Chase feud may have brought Community season 4 a step closer...
There was a real fear towards the end of last year that the end was nigh for the finest sitcom currently running on US TV, Community. Mid-way through season three, the show was moved off the schedulees, and it only eventually reappeared a few weeks’ back. You could be forgiven for thinking, at that point, that the show was doomed.
Turns out, though, that there’s been quite a lot of life in Community yet. And the recent pointers suggest that, if anything, it may just get a season four order. I’m wary to write that, as I don’t want to tempt fate, but the signs are suddenly looking a lot more positive.
Firstly, and crucially, the ratings are up. Compared to NBC’s other comedy shows, it’s only The Office that has been regularly performing better than Community for the network on Thursdays. Certainly, the fresh wave of viewer enthusiasm for it has done Community season four’s chances no harm at all.
Nor has, as Vulture reports, a freshly inked syndication deal with Comedy Central. The ramifications of this are interesting. It’s often pretty much read that you’ve hit gold when your show enters syndication, which guarantees a revenue stream for both new and old episodes. And that’s crucial, here: there’s now an outlet for repeats of Community, every one of which will bring cash into NBC’s coffers. It should certainly make the recommission decision a little easier.
Then there’s the subtle sponsorship from Subway, that you may have noticed being sneaked into more recent episodes. Subway deserve some sort of geek medal, whether you like their food or not: it was the food chain’s intervention that was reportedly pivotal in saving NBC’s Chuck, when it too was facing an uncertain future at the end of season three.
Next? Well, here’s the interesting one.
It’s been well reported over the weekend that the ongoing unease between Chevy Chase and showrunner Dan Harmon has shown little sign of relaxing. The most recent incident? Well, if you believe reports, then at the season three wrap party for Community, Dan Harmon gave a speech along the lines of “fuck you, Chevy”, encouraging others to join in.
Chase, who was with his wife and daughter, apparently stormed out, and left Harmon an angry answerphone message. Harmon subsequently seems to have played that message to others, as a recording of him doing so, including Chase’s message itself (“your writing is getting worse and worse” …. “you goddamn asshole”) has leaked online. The link is at the bottom.
This has consequently fuelled speculation that Chase and Community would be parting company were there to be a season four, yet that’s something that, oddly, may yet help Community’s chances. There’s been talk for years about Harmon and Chase not getting on, so there may be nothing to this, but were the actor to leave the show, then it’d inevitably have an impact on the budget. Community would be cheaper to make, and at a point where NBC is making a tight decision on recommissioning the show, that may yet be the difference.
Whether the show would be quite the same without Chevy Chase is another matter. Appreciating his character isn’t utterly central to the show, he’s nonetheless a terrific scene stealer, and has value to Community. That said, would his departure leave room for Dan Harmon and his team to bring a fresh face to Greendale?
Hopefully, the collection of forces at work here offer some light at the end of the tunnel for Community. It’s a terrific show, with some of the most ingenious comedy writing on television right now. And as die hard fans of the show know all to well, the very least we want from NBC is six seasons and a movie. As is stands? Whisper it, but season four might just be looking a good bet...
Why ratings, syndication, Subway and a Chevy Chase feud may have brought Community season 4 a step closer...
There was a real fear towards the end of last year that the end was nigh for the finest sitcom currently running on US TV, Community. Mid-way through season three, the show was moved off the schedulees, and it only eventually reappeared a few weeks’ back. You could be forgiven for thinking, at that point, that the show was doomed.
Turns out, though, that there’s been quite a lot of life in Community yet. And the recent pointers suggest that, if anything, it may just get a season four order. I’m wary to write that, as I don’t want to tempt fate, but the signs are suddenly looking a lot more positive.
Firstly, and crucially, the ratings are up. Compared to NBC’s other comedy shows, it’s only The Office that has been regularly performing better than Community for the network on Thursdays. Certainly, the fresh wave of viewer enthusiasm for it has done Community season four’s chances no harm at all.
Nor has, as Vulture reports, a freshly inked syndication deal with Comedy Central. The ramifications of this are interesting. It’s often pretty much read that you’ve hit gold when your show enters syndication, which guarantees a revenue stream for both new and old episodes. And that’s crucial, here: there’s now an outlet for repeats of Community, every one of which will bring cash into NBC’s coffers. It should certainly make the recommission decision a little easier.
Then there’s the subtle sponsorship from Subway, that you may have noticed being sneaked into more recent episodes. Subway deserve some sort of geek medal, whether you like their food or not: it was the food chain’s intervention that was reportedly pivotal in saving NBC’s Chuck, when it too was facing an uncertain future at the end of season three.
Next? Well, here’s the interesting one.
It’s been well reported over the weekend that the ongoing unease between Chevy Chase and showrunner Dan Harmon has shown little sign of relaxing. The most recent incident? Well, if you believe reports, then at the season three wrap party for Community, Dan Harmon gave a speech along the lines of “fuck you, Chevy”, encouraging others to join in.
Chase, who was with his wife and daughter, apparently stormed out, and left Harmon an angry answerphone message. Harmon subsequently seems to have played that message to others, as a recording of him doing so, including Chase’s message itself (“your writing is getting worse and worse” …. “you goddamn asshole”) has leaked online. The link is at the bottom.
This has consequently fuelled speculation that Chase and Community would be parting company were there to be a season four, yet that’s something that, oddly, may yet help Community’s chances. There’s been talk for years about Harmon and Chase not getting on, so there may be nothing to this, but were the actor to leave the show, then it’d inevitably have an impact on the budget. Community would be cheaper to make, and at a point where NBC is making a tight decision on recommissioning the show, that may yet be the difference.
Whether the show would be quite the same without Chevy Chase is another matter. Appreciating his character isn’t utterly central to the show, he’s nonetheless a terrific scene stealer, and has value to Community. That said, would his departure leave room for Dan Harmon and his team to bring a fresh face to Greendale?
Hopefully, the collection of forces at work here offer some light at the end of the tunnel for Community. It’s a terrific show, with some of the most ingenious comedy writing on television right now. And as die hard fans of the show know all to well, the very least we want from NBC is six seasons and a movie. As is stands? Whisper it, but season four might just be looking a good bet...
House’s legacy and the Sherlock archetype
House’s legacy and the Sherlock archetype
As we prepare to wave a final goodbye to House, Gem asks whether the series blazed a trail for the BBC's Sherlock...
There was a little sadness, but not much surprise, when Fox announced the decision to cancel House after its eighth season this year. Most would agree that the show’s pretty much exhausted the limits of its format, after eight seasons of life-threatening incidents, death-defying scenarios and pivotal, last-minute decisions. And that’s just a summary of the eponymous doctor’s love life...
The real heart of the show’s always been its weird and wonderful cases, and the medical mysteries Gregory House, M.D. found himself investigating from the show’s launch in November 2004 were always a little out of the ordinary. Over the years, we’ve seen debilitating memory problems, terrifying tropical diseases, smallpox caught from an eighteenth-century slave ship (don’t ask) and parasites in the brain. And no matter how many times lupus was suggested as the cause for some horrendous set of symptoms or other, the running joke was that nobody ever actually had it...until eventually, someone finally did. If House achieved anything in its lengthy run, it was to ensure that hypochondriacs had a whole new set of terrors to keep them awake at night.
Criticised by many for its adherence to its own peculiar formula, each episode of House saw the good doctor...okay, the really rather snide doctor faced with a medical case so bizarre that only he, armed with his powers of deduction, bitter sense of humour and industrial quantities of prescription drugs, could fathom. Surrounded by his team of hapless interns and berated by his disapproving peers - his only friend Wilson (Robert Sean Leonard) and his boss/sometime lust interest, Cuddy (Lisa Edelstein) - House rejected all manner of suggestions and tried all kinds of incredibly dangerous remedies before hitting on the right solution, just seconds before the patient finally exploded/evaporated/hit him from sheer fury (whichever came first).
After the departure of his original team at the end of season three, when, in typical House fashion, one was sacked and the other two resigned in protest, House subjected a brand new set of luckless hopefuls to his own set of diagnostic tests, eliminating one per week. This gimmick worked remarkably well – for the audience, at least - although life for the chosen few would, inevitably, prove difficult. A suicide, a hereditary illness and all sorts of romantic strife would plague the team at Princeton-Plainsboro as the seasons progressed. House would go to jail (at last!), Wilson would lose more than one lover and the hospital would, somehow, remain intact. Unlike Cuddy’s house after House drove into it, which was no doubt intended as a deep commentary on his own desire for self-destruction, but actually just took the show to a whole new level of crazy.
However, the series leaves behind another legacy, one a little more obscure than its lurid case files or the frankly bizarre romantic complications faced by its characters. David Shore and co’s attempt to refresh the medical drama, following the Fox network’s brief to avoid the genre’s white-coated, stethoscope-wielding clichés, was a much-needed shot in the arm for the stagnant, post-ER world of the medical procedural. Like all the most successful dramas, though, it wasn’t entirely original.
House is a particular kind of antihero: attractive – in a vaguely sociopathic sort of way – driven, obsessive, and awfully good at getting results. Sound familiar? Those of you who’ve been lapping up the adventures of a certain consulting detective should be nodding in recognition at this point. And there’s a very specific reason for that. The Sherlock Holmes reworked by Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss is, unsurprisingly enough, an adaptation of Arthur Conan Doyle’s literary creation. He’s been tinkered with, of course. The Victorian sleuth’s non-existent sex life has been, ahem, probed, while his drug addiction, interestingly, has been pushed into the background, reflecting the changing concerns of a different age. Rather than merely clothing the nineteenth-century icon in a swish coat and adding some complementary brooding, the character has been reworked to give a modern slant on the traits we’ve come to love. But the modern Sherlock, as written by pop-culture mavens such as Moffat and Gatiss, was never going to exist in a vacuum. Sometimes, the series has acknowledged this. Watson’s even called him Spock after one too many bouts of cold logic, in a sly nod to the influence of Sherlock’s analytical nature on Star Trek’s ultra-cool Vulcan pin-up (sorry, Kirk fans, I’m with Dax on this one).
So why are we talking about Star Trek and Sherlock, again? Don’t worry, I’m getting there. Doyle took his inspiration for Sherlock Holmes from Dr Joseph Bell, who he’d come across while working as a clerk at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary. Bell was a pioneer in the field of forensic science, in its infancy at the close of the nineteenth century, and seems to have assisted in several high-profile murder cases in his native Scotland. His technique was to take tiny details of a person’s appearance, dress or actions and extrapolate from those to form a larger picture of his or her character and habits. Doyle had the beginnings of his Sherlock right there, and was never slow to acknowledge his debt. David Shore and his team weren’t just paying an amusing homage to Doyle’s own creation when they launched House – they were actually going right back to the Holmes character’s real-life origins in medical school. We finally got an official acknowledgement of this in season five, when House was seen consulting one of Bell’s books (as well as the cheeky touch that House’s favourite reading material was none other than The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes). The Bell tome was a gift from the long-suffering Wilson, with the dedication ‘Greg, made me think of you.’ Just to underline the point, the patient Wilson got the book from was one Irene Adler...
Think about it. Instead of Holmes, we have House. Say them out loud, if it helps. Yes, that noise reverberating around the planet is the sound of several million palms striking several million faces. House’s long-suffering pal Wilson is strikingly similar to Holmes’ boon companion, Watson, who is – of course – also a doctor. Does that make Cuddy Lestrade’s counterpart, then? A promising new avenue for the Sherlock shippers, perhaps... House even has his very own equivalent of the Baker Street Irregulars (the brigade of street kids Holmes employs to run errands and uncover useful snippets of information) in the guise of his oppressed underlings, scurrying to test all the madcap theories he’s too lazy to disprove himself.
He also has a serious drug addiction, downing Vicodin to numb the pain of his injured leg just as Holmes injects a cocaine solution to ‘sharpen his thinking’ (curiously, an aspect of the Sherlock character that Moffat and co have been slow to explore). A couple of Moriarty-style nemeses have tested House’s patience over the years – the officious Vogler, a pharmaceuticals magnate with a financial stranglehold over the hospital, and Tritter, a policeman with a burning hatred of a certain drug-dependent medic – but none have lasted the course. Oh, and the name of the gunman who shot House at the end of season two? Take a wild guess.
At a time when Steven Moffat’s questioning the need for an American version of the Holmes myth, it’s important to remember the cyclical nature of these pop culture trends. Moffat and Gatiss’ Sherlock exists in a post-House world. The character as written by Doyle is rarely as snide or cold as the TV Sherlock can be at his worst, so why do we accept these traits as canonical in the face of all the evidence? The simple answer is that the character has been diffused through a prism of so many other similar figures over the years. It’s difficult to remember now, when Benedict Cumberbatch’s take on the character is so widely accepted and admired, but when Sherlock was first announced, there was a certain amount of scepticism that an updated version would bring anything new to the table. Did House, with its moody, waspish medic/detective hybrid, prime us all to accept the new Sherlock as something more than a gimmick?
As we prepare to wave a final goodbye to House, Gem asks whether the series blazed a trail for the BBC's Sherlock...
There was a little sadness, but not much surprise, when Fox announced the decision to cancel House after its eighth season this year. Most would agree that the show’s pretty much exhausted the limits of its format, after eight seasons of life-threatening incidents, death-defying scenarios and pivotal, last-minute decisions. And that’s just a summary of the eponymous doctor’s love life...
The real heart of the show’s always been its weird and wonderful cases, and the medical mysteries Gregory House, M.D. found himself investigating from the show’s launch in November 2004 were always a little out of the ordinary. Over the years, we’ve seen debilitating memory problems, terrifying tropical diseases, smallpox caught from an eighteenth-century slave ship (don’t ask) and parasites in the brain. And no matter how many times lupus was suggested as the cause for some horrendous set of symptoms or other, the running joke was that nobody ever actually had it...until eventually, someone finally did. If House achieved anything in its lengthy run, it was to ensure that hypochondriacs had a whole new set of terrors to keep them awake at night.
Criticised by many for its adherence to its own peculiar formula, each episode of House saw the good doctor...okay, the really rather snide doctor faced with a medical case so bizarre that only he, armed with his powers of deduction, bitter sense of humour and industrial quantities of prescription drugs, could fathom. Surrounded by his team of hapless interns and berated by his disapproving peers - his only friend Wilson (Robert Sean Leonard) and his boss/sometime lust interest, Cuddy (Lisa Edelstein) - House rejected all manner of suggestions and tried all kinds of incredibly dangerous remedies before hitting on the right solution, just seconds before the patient finally exploded/evaporated/hit him from sheer fury (whichever came first).
After the departure of his original team at the end of season three, when, in typical House fashion, one was sacked and the other two resigned in protest, House subjected a brand new set of luckless hopefuls to his own set of diagnostic tests, eliminating one per week. This gimmick worked remarkably well – for the audience, at least - although life for the chosen few would, inevitably, prove difficult. A suicide, a hereditary illness and all sorts of romantic strife would plague the team at Princeton-Plainsboro as the seasons progressed. House would go to jail (at last!), Wilson would lose more than one lover and the hospital would, somehow, remain intact. Unlike Cuddy’s house after House drove into it, which was no doubt intended as a deep commentary on his own desire for self-destruction, but actually just took the show to a whole new level of crazy.
However, the series leaves behind another legacy, one a little more obscure than its lurid case files or the frankly bizarre romantic complications faced by its characters. David Shore and co’s attempt to refresh the medical drama, following the Fox network’s brief to avoid the genre’s white-coated, stethoscope-wielding clichés, was a much-needed shot in the arm for the stagnant, post-ER world of the medical procedural. Like all the most successful dramas, though, it wasn’t entirely original.
House is a particular kind of antihero: attractive – in a vaguely sociopathic sort of way – driven, obsessive, and awfully good at getting results. Sound familiar? Those of you who’ve been lapping up the adventures of a certain consulting detective should be nodding in recognition at this point. And there’s a very specific reason for that. The Sherlock Holmes reworked by Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss is, unsurprisingly enough, an adaptation of Arthur Conan Doyle’s literary creation. He’s been tinkered with, of course. The Victorian sleuth’s non-existent sex life has been, ahem, probed, while his drug addiction, interestingly, has been pushed into the background, reflecting the changing concerns of a different age. Rather than merely clothing the nineteenth-century icon in a swish coat and adding some complementary brooding, the character has been reworked to give a modern slant on the traits we’ve come to love. But the modern Sherlock, as written by pop-culture mavens such as Moffat and Gatiss, was never going to exist in a vacuum. Sometimes, the series has acknowledged this. Watson’s even called him Spock after one too many bouts of cold logic, in a sly nod to the influence of Sherlock’s analytical nature on Star Trek’s ultra-cool Vulcan pin-up (sorry, Kirk fans, I’m with Dax on this one).
So why are we talking about Star Trek and Sherlock, again? Don’t worry, I’m getting there. Doyle took his inspiration for Sherlock Holmes from Dr Joseph Bell, who he’d come across while working as a clerk at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary. Bell was a pioneer in the field of forensic science, in its infancy at the close of the nineteenth century, and seems to have assisted in several high-profile murder cases in his native Scotland. His technique was to take tiny details of a person’s appearance, dress or actions and extrapolate from those to form a larger picture of his or her character and habits. Doyle had the beginnings of his Sherlock right there, and was never slow to acknowledge his debt. David Shore and his team weren’t just paying an amusing homage to Doyle’s own creation when they launched House – they were actually going right back to the Holmes character’s real-life origins in medical school. We finally got an official acknowledgement of this in season five, when House was seen consulting one of Bell’s books (as well as the cheeky touch that House’s favourite reading material was none other than The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes). The Bell tome was a gift from the long-suffering Wilson, with the dedication ‘Greg, made me think of you.’ Just to underline the point, the patient Wilson got the book from was one Irene Adler...
Think about it. Instead of Holmes, we have House. Say them out loud, if it helps. Yes, that noise reverberating around the planet is the sound of several million palms striking several million faces. House’s long-suffering pal Wilson is strikingly similar to Holmes’ boon companion, Watson, who is – of course – also a doctor. Does that make Cuddy Lestrade’s counterpart, then? A promising new avenue for the Sherlock shippers, perhaps... House even has his very own equivalent of the Baker Street Irregulars (the brigade of street kids Holmes employs to run errands and uncover useful snippets of information) in the guise of his oppressed underlings, scurrying to test all the madcap theories he’s too lazy to disprove himself.
He also has a serious drug addiction, downing Vicodin to numb the pain of his injured leg just as Holmes injects a cocaine solution to ‘sharpen his thinking’ (curiously, an aspect of the Sherlock character that Moffat and co have been slow to explore). A couple of Moriarty-style nemeses have tested House’s patience over the years – the officious Vogler, a pharmaceuticals magnate with a financial stranglehold over the hospital, and Tritter, a policeman with a burning hatred of a certain drug-dependent medic – but none have lasted the course. Oh, and the name of the gunman who shot House at the end of season two? Take a wild guess.
At a time when Steven Moffat’s questioning the need for an American version of the Holmes myth, it’s important to remember the cyclical nature of these pop culture trends. Moffat and Gatiss’ Sherlock exists in a post-House world. The character as written by Doyle is rarely as snide or cold as the TV Sherlock can be at his worst, so why do we accept these traits as canonical in the face of all the evidence? The simple answer is that the character has been diffused through a prism of so many other similar figures over the years. It’s difficult to remember now, when Benedict Cumberbatch’s take on the character is so widely accepted and admired, but when Sherlock was first announced, there was a certain amount of scepticism that an updated version would bring anything new to the table. Did House, with its moody, waspish medic/detective hybrid, prime us all to accept the new Sherlock as something more than a gimmick?
Doctor Who series 7 latest news round-up
Doctor Who series 7 latest news round-up
The latest titbits regarding the next series of Doctor Who, all in one place!
Production continues, as it will for some time, on the seventh season of Doctor Who since its revival back in 2005. And a few more details about the new series run have popped up this week.
Firstly, we now know that it's the first episode of the series, the one being penned by Steven Moffat, that will feature the Daleks. Lots of Daleks, in fact, from every era of the show. It sounds like a fine way to kick of what’s going to be the 50th birthday season, and we’re promised explosions, too. Always welcome.
The first half of the series has also fallen into shape. A lot of this is known, but one or two gaps have been filled in.
Episodes two and four, then, are the ones penned by Chris Chibnall. The first of the two, the one that includes Mark Williams, Rupert Graves and David Bradley in its cast, was apparently filmed partly at Bad Wolf Bay, so make of that what will.
It’s already well known that episode three has been penned by Toby Whithouse, and will take the Doctor to the wild west (albeit filmed in Spain).
Episode five, meanwhile, is one where we see the return of the Weeping Angels. Steven Moffat has written this one, and it’ll be the farewell episode for Rory and Amy. It’s been revealed at the recent Doctor Who Convention that some of the filming for this one will be taking place in New York (although the episode is currently shooting in Cardiff).
The Christmas special will be episode six, which is where new companion Jenna-Louise Colemen will come in. And then we understand the plan is for the show to carry on uninterrupted into 2013.
Blogtor Who also reports that River Song is set to make an appearance in the series somewhere along the line.
There are still lots of gaps to fill in, as you might expect, but as we find out more, we’ll let you know…
The latest titbits regarding the next series of Doctor Who, all in one place!
Production continues, as it will for some time, on the seventh season of Doctor Who since its revival back in 2005. And a few more details about the new series run have popped up this week.
Firstly, we now know that it's the first episode of the series, the one being penned by Steven Moffat, that will feature the Daleks. Lots of Daleks, in fact, from every era of the show. It sounds like a fine way to kick of what’s going to be the 50th birthday season, and we’re promised explosions, too. Always welcome.
The first half of the series has also fallen into shape. A lot of this is known, but one or two gaps have been filled in.
Episodes two and four, then, are the ones penned by Chris Chibnall. The first of the two, the one that includes Mark Williams, Rupert Graves and David Bradley in its cast, was apparently filmed partly at Bad Wolf Bay, so make of that what will.
It’s already well known that episode three has been penned by Toby Whithouse, and will take the Doctor to the wild west (albeit filmed in Spain).
Episode five, meanwhile, is one where we see the return of the Weeping Angels. Steven Moffat has written this one, and it’ll be the farewell episode for Rory and Amy. It’s been revealed at the recent Doctor Who Convention that some of the filming for this one will be taking place in New York (although the episode is currently shooting in Cardiff).
The Christmas special will be episode six, which is where new companion Jenna-Louise Colemen will come in. And then we understand the plan is for the show to carry on uninterrupted into 2013.
Blogtor Who also reports that River Song is set to make an appearance in the series somewhere along the line.
There are still lots of gaps to fill in, as you might expect, but as we find out more, we’ll let you know…
'Glee' First Listen: Darren Criss and Matt Bomer Cover Duran Duran, Christina Aguilera
'Glee' First Listen: Darren Criss and Matt Bomer Cover Duran Duran, Christina Aguilera
The on-screen brothers mash-up "Rio" and "Hungry Like the Wolf," while Criss goes solo to cover Christina Aguilera's "Fighter."
Glee returns Tuesday when Matt Bomer guest stars as the big brother to Darren Criss' Blaine Anderson with the pair taking on 1980s favorite Duran Duran.
In addition to covering Gotye's "Somebody That I Used to Know," the brothers Anderson will share a mash-up of "Hungry Like the Wolf" and "Rio," songs that Bomer told that he listened to as a kid.
"I grew up sharing a room with my brother, and every night for a good solid year we'd listen to the tape -- I know I'm dating myself! -- of Duran Duran as we went to bed," he told. "So getting to go in and record that was a dream come true. And getting to perform it with someone as talented as Darren was the icing on the cake."
In addition, Criss goes solo with a cover of Christina Aguilera's "Fighter," as he finds an outlet to air his frustrations with Cooper Anderson's arrival
Somebody that I used to know
Hungry like the wolf / Rio
Fighter
The on-screen brothers mash-up "Rio" and "Hungry Like the Wolf," while Criss goes solo to cover Christina Aguilera's "Fighter."
Glee returns Tuesday when Matt Bomer guest stars as the big brother to Darren Criss' Blaine Anderson with the pair taking on 1980s favorite Duran Duran.
In addition to covering Gotye's "Somebody That I Used to Know," the brothers Anderson will share a mash-up of "Hungry Like the Wolf" and "Rio," songs that Bomer told that he listened to as a kid.
"I grew up sharing a room with my brother, and every night for a good solid year we'd listen to the tape -- I know I'm dating myself! -- of Duran Duran as we went to bed," he told. "So getting to go in and record that was a dream come true. And getting to perform it with someone as talented as Darren was the icing on the cake."
In addition, Criss goes solo with a cover of Christina Aguilera's "Fighter," as he finds an outlet to air his frustrations with Cooper Anderson's arrival
Somebody that I used to know
Hungry like the wolf / Rio
Fighter
3Ality Technica to Debut New 3D Rig at NAB
3Ality Technica to Debut New 3D Rig at NAB
The company’s technology has been used on productions such as "The Hobbit," "The Amazing Spider-Man" and "Prometheus."
3D technology developer 3Ality Technica -- whose current name was introduced in 2011 when 3Ality Digital acquired Element Techica -- will debut the first joint effort from the combined companies, the Helix 3D rig, at the upcoming National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) Show that begins April 14 in Las Vegas.
3Ality Technica’s 3D rigs have been used on a string of high-profile features including The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, The Great Gatsby, Prometheus, The Amazing Spider-Man, and Oz: The Great and Powerful. They are also used for television, including live-event broadcasts such as Wimbledon.
The Helix rig combines the automation of the 3Alty rigs and the modular approach of the Element Technica gear. It is designed to handle a wider range of applications including handheld or studio use for features and broadcasting, according to senior vp Stephen Pizzo.
The Helix was also designed for use with 3Ality’s IntelleSuite control and automation software.
At NAB, the company will also showcase its related stereo image processor, the SIP 2100, as well as the IntelleCam, IntelleCal, and IntelleMatte software, all developed with the aim of reducing setup time and production costs.
3Ality will introduce a new Sony PMW-F3 accessories kit, designed in partnership with Sony for the F3 2D camera.
At NAB, NEP Broadcasting will exhibit an outside broadcast truck outfitted with 3ality Technica technology.
The company’s technology has been used on productions such as "The Hobbit," "The Amazing Spider-Man" and "Prometheus."
3D technology developer 3Ality Technica -- whose current name was introduced in 2011 when 3Ality Digital acquired Element Techica -- will debut the first joint effort from the combined companies, the Helix 3D rig, at the upcoming National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) Show that begins April 14 in Las Vegas.
3Ality Technica’s 3D rigs have been used on a string of high-profile features including The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, The Great Gatsby, Prometheus, The Amazing Spider-Man, and Oz: The Great and Powerful. They are also used for television, including live-event broadcasts such as Wimbledon.
The Helix rig combines the automation of the 3Alty rigs and the modular approach of the Element Technica gear. It is designed to handle a wider range of applications including handheld or studio use for features and broadcasting, according to senior vp Stephen Pizzo.
The Helix was also designed for use with 3Ality’s IntelleSuite control and automation software.
At NAB, the company will also showcase its related stereo image processor, the SIP 2100, as well as the IntelleCam, IntelleCal, and IntelleMatte software, all developed with the aim of reducing setup time and production costs.
3Ality will introduce a new Sony PMW-F3 accessories kit, designed in partnership with Sony for the F3 2D camera.
At NAB, NEP Broadcasting will exhibit an outside broadcast truck outfitted with 3ality Technica technology.
Sofia Vergara: 'Saturday Night Live is an American tradition'
Sofia Vergara: 'Saturday Night Live is an American tradition'
Sofia Vergara has declared that hosting Saturday Night Live for the first time is a major honour.
The Modern Family actress promoted her sketch comedy debut on Thursday (April 5) on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, where was she asked by Jimmy Fallon if she was familiar with SNL when she grew up in Colombia.
"I think it's like an institution - Saturday Night Live. It's like one of those shows that is like an American tradition. And, we have cable in South America," she joked to Fallon.
Fallon went on to say that he'd spoken with two SNL staffers who said they had "never seen a prettier person" than Vergara.
"Who?" Vergara retorted playfully, but Fallon remained mum on his sources.
This weekend's Saturday Night Live will not only see the debuts of Vergara and One Direction, but also new castmember Kate McKinnon.
Saturday Night Live airs at 11.30/10.30c on NBC.
Sofia Vergara has declared that hosting Saturday Night Live for the first time is a major honour.
The Modern Family actress promoted her sketch comedy debut on Thursday (April 5) on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, where was she asked by Jimmy Fallon if she was familiar with SNL when she grew up in Colombia.
"I think it's like an institution - Saturday Night Live. It's like one of those shows that is like an American tradition. And, we have cable in South America," she joked to Fallon.
Fallon went on to say that he'd spoken with two SNL staffers who said they had "never seen a prettier person" than Vergara.
"Who?" Vergara retorted playfully, but Fallon remained mum on his sources.
This weekend's Saturday Night Live will not only see the debuts of Vergara and One Direction, but also new castmember Kate McKinnon.
Saturday Night Live airs at 11.30/10.30c on NBC.
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)